BACKGROUND: CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS

Cerebral aneurysms are present in one to six percent of the American population. They pose a health risk because of their potential to rupture and bleed into the brain. Industry sources estimate that 30,000 patients are diagnosed with ruptured cerebral aneurysms each year in the United States. Embolic coiling is currently being used to treat approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with cerebral aneurysms in the United States. Industry sources also indicate that a significant percentage of patients diagnosed with cerebral aneurysms in European countries are treated using embolic coiling procedures and we believe that embolic coiling procedures can be used to treat a similar percentage of patients with cerebral aneurysms in the United States as awareness grows among patients and physicians of the advantages of embolic coiling.


Since the early 1990's cerebral aneurysms have been treated using an endovascular technique. In this procedure, an interventional radiologist guides a catheter from the femoral artery, up through the aorta, and into the cerebral vasculature either via the carotid or vertebral artery until it reaches the aneurysm. Coils are threaded through the catheter until the aneurysm is packed with enough coils to prevent blood flowing into it. This process is called embolization.

There has now been a significant series of published journal articles written by medical experts regarding the use, safety, efficacy and complications relating to treatment of cerebral aneurysms using endovascular techniques to place embolic coils1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The use of detachable embolic coils in the treatment of aneurysms has been specified to have a low incidence of complications10, and have a comparable patient outcome to surgical methods13.

This is not, however, to mean that the procedure is without reported risk or complication. The following surgical complications were reported: Incomplete occlusion of the aneurysm4
,5,7,8,9,13, re-rupture of the aneurysm during placement of the coils5,6,7,9,12, thromboembolism4,5,6,7,9,12, vasospasm3,12, requirement for additional patient interventions at a later date6,8,13, and re-bleeding at a future date4. The complications related to thromboembolism may be explained by the hypercoagulable state of patients who are in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage12.

In no instances did the authors consider decreased use of embolic coiling for the treatment of aneurysms due to surgical or post-surgical risks or complications. On the contrary, all authors reported on the potential benefit of this treatment, especially for patients who were not candidates for surgery. It appeared to be the belief of all that endovascular coiling to treat aneurysms would be expanded due to the positive patient outcomes, the strong potential benefits to the patient, and the low or acceptable level of risk.

(to view complete list of references click here )

 

 

References


1. Kallmes d., Kallmes M/H., Cloft H.J., and Dion J.E., Guglielmi Detachable Coil Embolization for Unruptured Aneurysms on Non-surgical
  Candidates: A cost- effectiveness exploration. AJNR 19: 167-176, Jan., 1998

(return to top)


2. Anonymous: Guglielmi Detachable Coil (GDC) U.S. Clinical Study Summary, Fremont, CA: Target Therapeutics, 1995

(return to top)


3. Vinuella F., Duckweiler G., Mawad M.: Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative, anatomical
   and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J. Neurosurgery 86: 475-482, 1997

(return to top)


4. Byrne J.V., Sohn M-J, and Molyneux A., " Five Year Experience with Coil Embolization for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Outcome
   and Incidence of Re- bleeding" In Press

(return to top)


5. Malisch T.W. et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100
  patients. J Neurosurg 87: 176-183, 1997

(return to top)


6. Moret J. et al. Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms using Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology
  38: 800-805,1996.

(return to top)


7. Raymond, J. et al. Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured and unruptured aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. J Neurosurg
  86: 211- 219, 1997.

(return to top)


8. Bavinzski G. et al. Endosaccular occlusion of basilar artery bifurcation aneurysms using electrically detachable coils. Acta Neurochir (Wien)
  134:184-189, 1995.

(return to top)


9. Pierot L. et al. Selective occlusion of basilar artery aneurysms using controlled detachable coils: report of 35 cases. Neurosurgery
  38: 938-954, 1996.

(return to top)


10. Graves V.B. et al. Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: effect on subsequent bleeding. Neurosurgery
   37: 640-648, 1995.

(return to top)


11. Richling B. et al. GDC-system embolization for brain aneurysms - location and follow-up. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 134:177-183, 1995.

(return to top)


12. Lylyk P. and Gioino C.G. Pitfalls and GDC complications in 459 intracranial aneurysms. Personal experience in Buenos Aires.
   Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology and intravascular neurosurgery. Elsevier Science B.V, pp179- 180, 1996.

(return to top)


13. Byrne J.V., Molyneux A.J., Brennan R.P and Renowden S.A. Embolization of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Journal of
    Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 59:610-620, 1995.

(return to top)